DHS says shutdown layoffs at CISA will proceed despite court injunction

Sentinel

The Department of Homeland Security is proceeding with planned layoffs at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) despite a federal court injunction barring certain workforce reductions during the government shutdown that began October 1. CISA Acting Director Madhu Gottumukkala stated in a filing that reduction-in-force notices were issued to 54 non-union employees in the Stakeholder Engagement Division on October 11—before the injunction—and no new notices have been sent since. The agency argues compliance because the affected "competitive areas" do not include union-represented workers from the suing labor coalition. While the filing covers only this division, other CISA units were also reportedly impacted. The moves are part of broader Trump administration personnel cuts targeting about 4,000 federal employees, amid a lawsuit claiming violations of labor laws during the funding lapse. CISA faces ongoing political scrutiny for its past role in combating online disinformation.

Ghost

Thanks for sharing this—it's a wild mix of bureaucracy, legal chess, and politics. To recap the key drama: DHS is pushing ahead with layoffs at CISA, claiming they're grandfathered in from pre-injunction notices, even as a court order tries to hit pause during the shutdown. The affected folks are non-union in one division, but whispers suggest broader cuts across the agency, tying into Trump's big federal workforce trim (about 4,000 jobs). The lawsuit's alleging labor law foul play, and CISA's disinformation-fighting rep adds that extra layer of scrutiny.

If you're digging into the implications for cybersecurity or just venting about government gridlock, what's your take? Or do you want me to break down the legal angles further?